Blog

Regardless of what your business is, we offer the following information for valuing your business.

There is no single “correct” way to dispose of a wedding ring after a broken engagement.

Core Points: ● Style clarity makes every decision easier later ● Budget choices shape guest experience more than décor ● Vendors should support your vision, not override it ● Timelines protect joy as much as logistics ● Personal moments matter more than perfection Starting With the Story You’re Telling Before venues or colors enter the conversation, define the feeling you want the day to carry. Is it intimate and slow, or loud and celebratory? When couples agree on the emotional tone first, decisions stop feeling reactive and start feeling aligned. This shared vision becomes your filter . If something doesn’t fit the story you’re telling, it doesn’t belong—no matter how popular it is. Budget Choices That Protect What Matters Money conversations can be uncomfortable, but they’re also revealing. A thoughtful budget isn’t about cutting joy; it’s about choosing where joy shows up. Some couples value food and music above all else, while others prioritize photography or a meaningful location. Before allocating numbers, talk honestly about what you’ll remember in ten years. That perspective keeps spending intentional instead of emotional. Design Decisions That Reflect Personality Design is where your style becomes visible. Colors, textures, attire, and florals all signal who you are as a couple. The most memorable weddings don’t chase trends—they feel cohesive and sincere. Use this moment to decide where you want simplicity and where you want drama. Balance is what keeps the day from feeling overdesigned or underwhelming. Choosing the Right People to Work With Vendors are collaborators, not just service providers. The best ones listen carefully and ask thoughtful questions instead of pushing prepackaged ideas. Chemistry matters here more than credentials alone. Before signing contracts, make sure each vendor understands not just what you want, but why you want it. That understanding shows up in the final result. A Planning Flow That Keeps You Grounded This approach helps couples move forward without feeling scattered: ● Clarify the emotional tone you want guests to feel ● Decide what deserves the biggest share of the budget ● Lock in the venue before finalizing design details ● Choose vendors who align with your communication style ● Build a timeline that includes rest, not just tasks Capturing Your Journey as a Couple One powerful way to personalize your celebration is by creating a short video that traces your relationship—from the first date to the proposal. Played at the reception, it gives guests context for what they’re celebrating and turns shared history into a collective moment. Old photos, casual clips, and voice notes can all come together into something meaningful. This isn’t about polish; it’s about honesty and connection. To elevate the final result, you can refine lighting, color, and stability using video effects in Premiere Pro , which also make it easy to remove distractions and enhance visual flow. How Timing Shapes the Entire Experience A realistic timeline protects your energy. When everything is rushed, even beautiful moments blur together. When there’s breathing room , you actually experience the day you planned. Build in transition time. It’s not wasted—it’s where laughter, calm, and presence live. Comparing Big Decisions

Even if you’re not the one who cheated, the wrong anti-adultery clause can work against you.

SAFE stands for Secure Adultery Finances Exception, and there’s a reason we built it this way. If you’ve already read our prior post on why most anti-adultery clauses fail, you know the problem: defining adultery is messy, proving it is harder, and enforcing it often costs more than it’s worth. The SAFE clause exists to work around those realities rather than fight them. Should You Include a SAFE Clause? As a general rule, most couples should avoid anti-adultery clauses altogether. They tend to add time, expense, and uncertainty to divorce proceedings—the exact opposite of what a prenup is supposed to do. Even when one spouse knows the truth, proving adultery in court is another matter entirely. That said, some couples are insistent. They know they’ll feel more secure with some form of protection in place. If that’s you, there’s one threshold question you need to answer first: Are you a couple of child-bearing age and capable of having children? If the answer is no, the SAFE clause won’t add meaningful value to your prenup. But if the answer is yes, this clause may be a good fit—if you understand how it works and why it’s structured the way it is. What the SAFE Clause Actually Does The SAFE clause is not about policing adult behavior. It’s about protecting children and preserving family resources. Specifically, it addresses children born outside the marriage and the financial impact that can have on children of the marriage. At its core, the clause says something like this: If, during the marriage, one spouse has a child with someone other than their spouse within ten (10) months of either party filing for divorce, that child is presumed to be the result of an adulterous relationship. As a result, the unfaithful spouse will receive only ___% of the marital assets and/or assume ___% of the marital liabilities. The ten-month window can be adjusted. The asset split can be adjusted. The mechanics are flexible. The point is simple: if adultery produces a child, the financial consequences shift. Why This Isn’t “Punitive” At first glance, this may feel punitive. But the goal isn’t punishment, it’s resource preservation. There is a finite pool of marital assets. Those assets fund alimony, support children of the marriage, and—under the law—must also support children born outside the marriage. When a third child enters the picture, those resources get stretched thinner. And the people who usually pay the price are the children of the marriage. Let’s start with a baseline scenario to illustrate: 1. Arthur and Betty are married and have one daughter, Cheryl. 2. Together, they build substantial assets through careful investing and saving. 3. They divorced simply because they grew apart. There was no adultery. 4. Arthur receives 50% of the marital assets through the divorce. 5. Betty receives 50% of the marital assets through the divorce. 6. When Arthur dies, Cheryl inherits Arthur’s 50%. 7. When Betty dies, Cheryl inherits Betty’s 50%. Result: everything Arthur and Betty built together ultimately goes to Cheryl, precisely as intended. Now, Add a Child Born Outside the Marriage Let’s introduce two legal facts: • A child born outside the marriage is entitled to child support. • That child has inheritance rights. With that in mind: 1. Arthur and Betty are married and have one daughter, Cheryl. 2. They build significant marital assets together. 3. Betty has an affair with another man. 4. Betty has a child, Delilah, with the other man. 5. Arthur and Betty divorce. 6. Arthur gets 50% of the marital assets through the divorce. 7. Betty gets 50% of the marital assets through the divorce. 8. Betty must use part of her share to support Delilah. 9. When Arthur dies, Cheryl inherits Arthur’s assets. 10. When Betty dies, Cheryl and Delilah split Betty’s assets equally. Result: The economic hit lands hardest on Cheryl. Arthur had no say in the affair. Cheryl had no say in the affair. Yet the assets Arthur and Betty built together—intended for Cheryl—are permanently reduced to support a child born outside the marriage. Delilah isn’t at fault either. She can’t be disinherited or punished for circumstances she didn’t choose. But that doesn’t change the financial reality. How the SAFE Clause Fixes This A properly drafted SAFE clause changes the divorce math before that damage occurs. In this scenario, the clause might provide that Arthur—the non-cheating spouse—receives 75% of the marital assets. That allows Cheryl’s expected inheritance to remain intact through Arthur, while still ensuring Delilah receives the support and inheritance the law requires. No prenup can fix the emotional fallout of adultery, especially when it creates a half-sibling. But a prenup can prevent avoidable financial harm to the children of the marriage. Why a SAFE Clause is Worthwhile When Other Clauses Are Not The SAFE clause sidesteps the three biggest problems with traditional anti-adultery provisions: • Definition: No debates about what counts as cheating. • Proof: No reliance on receipts, texts, or subjective interpretations. • Ability to Pay: No court determination of ability to pay alimony because the SAFE clause is marital asset-based, not alimony-based. A child conceived and born outside the marriage is an objective, legally recognized fact. That makes the clause far easier and less costly to enforce than any behavior-based alternative. In addition, the SAFE clause triggers a change in the division of marital assets, not an alimony recalculation. So, there is no judicial “ability to pay” analysis that makes many alimony-based anti-adultery clauses unenforceable or uncollectible. That said, drafting a comprehensive SAFE clause correctly is very technical, and pitfalls must be avoided. It needs to be done carefully to be enforceable and fair—but when done right, it’s the rare anti-adultery clause that can actually deliver while remaining consistent with what couples want from a prenup.

Newlyweds face a joyful—and sometimes awkward—shift: two financial histories become one shared future. Whether you’re merging accounts or just calendars, the first year of marriage is the best moment to align money habits, expectations, and goals so finances support your relationship instead of stressing it.

A post about newlywed couples creating a happy marriage. Advice on how to sync your life, chore load, reduce device usage.

A prenuptial or postnuptial agreement can save your business. Consider two dry cleaners, Ricky and Fred. Both thought they would be married to their wives until “death do they part.” Unfortunately, they both ended up divorced. Ricky walked out of divorce court personally and professionally ruined. Fred, while emotionally drained, was able to maintain and grow his successful business. Why the different outcomes? Ricky’s Story Ricky owned a dry cleaning business with Lucy, his wife of 19 years. Ricky was in charge of all aspects of the business, but Lucy did manage the company’s payroll and vendors part-time. Occasionally, she worked the front counter. For the most part, Lucy raised the children and cared for her elderly parents. When they decided to divorce, Ricky and Lucy were still civil and wanted their divorce to be amicable. Ricky and Lucy worked together, without lawyers, to craft a plan for sharing time with their teenage sons, and for sharing the family’s expenses. They also agreed to sell their house after their youngest son graduated high school. After a few months, and at the urging of a well-intentioned friend, Lucy hired a lawyer to write up the couples’ plan. Lucy’s main goal was to make sure the divorce ended fairly for her children. The lawyer, however, believed that since any small business owner could hide income, assets, or a company’s true value, then Ricky must be doing that too. Even though Lucy had a base of knowledge of the business’s finances, she trusted her lawyer and figured that he knew better. So, she agreed to his “scorched earth” strategy to protect her children. What is a “scorched earth strategy”? This is a common tactic to squeeze a business owner into a large and early settlement. The lawyer hires an accountant, and they go after every scrap of information and document pertaining to the company’s assets and liabilities, and they question it all—every argument and angle of attack is fair game. Much of the cost of providing the information and documents, and defending business decisions, must be paid by the business. Scared and desperate, Ricky lawyered up too. Unfortunately, Ricky’s lawyer couldn’t advise him on the settlement terms proposed by Lucy’s lawyer without conducting his own analysis of the company’s voluminous records. Much of the paper work involved in operating a dry cleaning business was foreign to him, and the stringent environmental regulations and reporting was overwhelming. Ricky’s lawyer had to hire his own accountant to help value the business for the divorce. Ricky and Lucy were now far from civil with one another, and the mud began to fly. Faced with dueling accountants, complicated and conflicting arguments about the business’s finances and value, and accusations against Ricky of financial wrongdoing, the family court judge appointed an independent forensic accountant to advise the court. The independent accountant saw that the business, which was the couple’s biggest asset, was crumbling because the ugly divorce was keeping Ricky from focusing on the business. The accountant was also worried about the accusations of financial wrongdoing by Ricky. So, on the independent accountant’s recommendation, the court appointed a receiver to operate and protect the dry cleaning business. Ricky and Lucy were now paying six different professionals, and trial was still months away. The receiver discovered that the company’s records did not comply with dry cleaning waste disposal regulations, and reported the non-compliance to government authorities. Ricky and Lucy blamed each other for the missing paperwork, and the sour relationship between them stalled and ultimately prevented joint efforts at an amnesty program and damage control. The business began to accrue daily statutory fines, employees were laid off, debts mounted, and the business eventually shut its doors while Ricky and Lucy continued to fight in divorce court. A year later, with no business to provide income for Ricky or Lucy, Ricky agreed to settle by paying Lucy more than half of his share of the house. Lucy accepted the offer, even though it was smaller then what she expected originally, because her share of the house was pledged to pay her lawyer’s fees. Fred’s Story Fred was married to Ethel for 22 years, and they have a daughter. Like Ricky and Lucy, Fred ran the business while Ethel was involved part-time in just certain aspects. But unlike Ricky and Lucy, when Fred bought his dry cleaning business nine years earlier, Fred and Ethel signed a postnuptial agreement to protect each other in case of divorce. The attorney-drafted agreement laid out a strict structure for evaluating and dividing the business, and for determining Fred’s true income for spousal and child support calculations. It identified and limited the financial information and documents that the business would have to disclose. It also required that the couple use a single neutral accountant (who would be paid from marital property and not by the company), to gather and evaluate that financial information and documentation. Early in the divorce, Ethel agreed that the postnuptial agreement was valid. She waived any right to ask the court to force the company to disclose more information or documents than described in the postnuptial agreement. This entitled Ethel to an immediate, fair, and higher award of support, thanks to a provision that she and Fred put in the agreement to encourage a quick resolution. Within a month, Fred and Ethel’s divorce was finalized, with minimal attorneys’ and accountant fees, and with no interference or intrusion into the dry cleaning business or operations. How could two similarly situated businesses and families leave divorce court with such different results? The first story is horrifying, but exceedingly common. Many states have onerous disclosure requirements that unnecessarily burden the time and finances of a small business. Unscrupulous divorce lawyers are trained to hone in and target a business owner’s fear of having the business’s confidential and financial information exposed to the world, to induce an early and usually unfair settlement. Fair and careful divorce lawyers will also want extensive company records, because they fear being liable for giving bad advice if they make recommendations without investigating the whole picture themselves. Either way, good lawyer or a bad one, smart judge or not, a case involving a small business can be very costly. The best way to avoid being a Ricky, is to get a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement like Fred. A good prenuptial or postnuptial agreement can render the most intrusive and damaging financial disclosures unnecessary, and can limit or attribute the related costs away from the business. In some situations, as shown above, they can save the business itself. If Ricky had a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement in place, maybe a receiver would not have been necessary, and Ricky and Lucy could have resolved the business’s regulatory problems confidentially without going out of business. Ricky and Fred were not wrong to believe in their marriages. A life-long commitment is not fanciful; it is a hopeful and beautiful goal. Most couples think they will reach that goal and that other couples will fill our country’s depressing divorce statistics. But consider this, we buy life insurance, install security systems, and wear seat belts “just in case.” They give us security even if we think that odds will always be in our favor. A careful and thorough prenuptial or postnuptial agreement can provide you, your spouse, and your business with security that all will be protected in a divorce, and that years of building a life and a business will not be burned to the ground. Chantale Suttle is the Managing Attorney and Founder of DADvocacy™ Law Firm, which is headquartered in Miami, Florida. She has been in the exclusive practice of family law for over 21 years and has served countless small business owners in divorce court. Drafting prenuptial and postnuptial agreements for small business owners is her favorite work.

Your fiancé or fiancée presented you with a prenuptial draft: will you sign it before you hear wedding bells? Now you need a review by an attorney to ensure that your assets and your future security are protected: welcome to JustPrenups' prenup review! JustPrenups now offers UPLOADR: quickly share your prenup draft easily from any device in multiples format through UPLOADR on our site - no scanning, no email. Once we receive your prenup draft, an attorney examines the prenup that you received and then meets with you for a free consultation on Zoom. We hold your document and its data in confidence, even if you don't retain us, per our ethical requirements.

Florida is a quirky place full of contrasts, and so is its family law. In particular, recent updates to Florida family law have changed the rules for alimony in Florida prenups. If your prenuptial agreement doesn't follow these changed rules, your prenup may not be valid and enforceable; as a result, you may be facing high financial stakes in divorce litigation that may put your assets at risk.

Avoid the top ten mistakes commonly made in prenups. Do you believe that your prenup will protect you in every state where you may live as a couple into the future? Read this post to check your prenup's enforcability.